Articles
 The Challenge of Change
 Elul 24
 Elul 23
 Elul 22
 Elul 21
 Elul 20
 Elul 19
 Elul 17
 Elul 16
 Elul 15

Series [All]
 Administration
 Elul 5777 (9)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Old Testament is Dying
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Tuesday, 25 August 2015
Basic Identity Theory IV

Contemporary Social Psychological Theories,
Ed. Peter J Burke, Stanford University Press, 2006,
Chapter 5 "Identity Theory" (pp. 88-110), page 89-90

Stet's fourth assertion starts to address the way that identities interact:

In role-based identities, there are different perceptions and action between individuals, as roles interact with counter-roles.

An obvious example might be a doctor and a patient, or a sales assistand and a customer. In fact, Stets continues:

Any role identity that a person claims in an interaction always has a related, alternative identity that is claimed by another. Thus any role identity is always related to a corresponding counter-identity.

It is because of that relationship, Stets adds that,

roles activate a sense of efficacy rather than a sense of self-worth as in group identities. It is what one does in one's role identity that is important compared to who one is on the basis of one's group identity.

What, I wonder, is a Mssianic Jewish identity? Is it a role identity or a social identity? Is it what we do - and we do do a lot of things - or who we are? And which leads which - are we because we do, or do we out of who we are?

Posted By Jonathan, 8:01am Comment Comments: 0